[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ossig] Linux security patches - costs and features?

To: ossig <ossig@mncc.com.my>
Subject: Re: [ossig] Linux security patches - costs and features?
From: Colin Charles <byte@aeon.com.my>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 02:21:17 +1000
In-reply-to: <200309300950.05355.hongyee@polyscientific.com.my>
Organization: ByteBot.net
References: <3F78EA08.5090000@mimos.my><200309300950.05355.hongyee@polyscientific.com.my>
Reply-to: ossig@mncc.com.my
Sender: owner-ossig@mncc.com.my

On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 19:50, Seah Hong Yee wrote:

> > So in terms of cost, from what I can see, Debian wins.  In terms
> > of remote push of security updates, from what I know, Red Hat wins,
> > but I'm not sure how the others work.
> 
> In therms of cost mandrake can be the same as debian. Debian's apt-get does 
> allow auto-update if I am not mistaken. Mandrake CAN get update automatically 
> through URPMI. 

as *can* Fedora Linux's up2date. it can read from yum and apt sources
just fine.
-- 
Colin Charles, byte@aeon.com.my
http://www.bytebot.net/


------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe: send mail to ossig-request@mncc.com.my
with "unsubscribe ossig" in the body of the message

References:
- [ossig] Linux security patches - costs and features?
  - From: Imran William Smith <iwsmith@mimos.my>
- Re: [ossig] Linux security patches - costs and features?
  - From: Seah Hong Yee <hongyee@polyscientific.com.my>

Prev by Date: Re: [ossig] Linux security patches - costs and features?
Next by Date: Re: [ossig] Linux security patches - costs and features?
Previous by thread: Re: [ossig] Linux security patches - costs and features?
Next by thread: Re: [ossig] Linux security patches - costs and features?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread