Re: [ossig] (Fwd) an email from a malaysian chinese from australia.

[Dinesh Nair <dinesh@alphaque.com>]

On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Khairil Yusof wrote:

> Now if only 2 people were required instead of 4, the 2 left can get
> higher wages, company can get higher profits, and 2 more people are
> available to be more productive elsewhere.

but then there would not be employment for the nephews of the shareholder,
i.e. the two people who're no longer needed. :)


Regards,                           /\_/\   "All dogs go to heaven."
dinesh@alphaque.com                (0 0)    http://www.alphaque.com/
+==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+
| for a in past present future; do                                        |
|   for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do   |
|   echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b."  |
| done; done                                                              |
+=========================================================================+


------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe: send mail to ossig-request@mncc.com.my
with "unsubscribe ossig" in the body of the message