[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ossig] New Telephone Survey is in the works on Governments policies on OSS

To: ossig@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ossig] New Telephone Survey is in the works on Governments policies on OSS
From: Seah Hong Yee <hongyee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 12:15:59 +0800
In-Reply-To: <20041201040738.GA21453@bugs.md.com.my>
References: <fb710ff204113000031400e4ca@mail.gmail.com> <200411301632.19601.hongyee@polyscientific.com.my> <20041201040738.GA21453@bugs.md.com.my>
Reply-To: ossig@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-ossig@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1

On Wednesday 01 December 2004 12:07, cdemarco@fastmail.fm wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 04:32:19PM +0800, Seah Hong Yee wrote:
> > To  answer to a survey with  a lot malformed  questioned and will be
> > sure to contribute  to a bunch  of nonsense result,  I kind of think
> > this would be a waste of my time.
>
> Totally agree.

On the other hand, if you are a contact worker and get paid by the hour, may 
not be a bad idea. 


---------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe: send mail to ossig-request@mncc.com.my
with "unsubscribe ossig" in the body of the message

References:
- Re: [ossig] New Telephone Survey is in the works on Governments policies on OSS
  - From: cdemarco

Prev by Date: Re: [ossig] Do we need a local Linux Magazine?
Next by Date: [ossig] Re: [myoss] OSS is not all Linux
Prev by thread: Re: [ossig] New Telephone Survey is in the works on Governments policies on OSS
Next by thread: RE: [ossig] Do we need a local Linux Magazine?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread