[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ossig] Re: [myoss] DAP MALAYSIA: Broadband for all in Malaysia]
I hope I am not opening up a can of worms here. The government keeps complaining there're not enough of OSS vendor support.
I'm inclined to think otherwise. So assuming the OSS vendor support
issue does not exist, what is the barrier then ? Besides what you
mentioned below, afaik, to deal with the government, there's a
mandatory 'quota' about a company's composition of certain types of
employees that it must adhere to. Last I check it has to be a majority
for that quota.
It MAY or MAY NOT be public or official, but knowing our government's
modus operandi since the day we were born, I can fully understand what
they mean by 'Not enough OSS vendor support'.
If that were to be the case, I would not be surprised if their version
of 'Not enough OSS vendor support' holds true in their lingua franca.
On 10/7/05, Dr Molly Cheah <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Whatever you believe in, you need to know and understand Govt
procurement requirements. They have certain rules that you have to
follow if you're tendering for the project. e.g in a certain rfp we went
in for, we obviously couldn't propose using debian linux. We were also
told that in a previous case scenario that they would want to see a
local office (doesn't matter if its just a cubicle) for support, so we
had to propose Novell Suse rather than Redhat Linux. Yusseri will tell
you that procurement requirements will still need to be followed.