[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ossig] FYI: MSC Patent Series: Patent 101 19/10/2005
Yoon Kit Yong wrote:
> Going from the FOSS angle will not be as convincing,
> as to these corporate types, FOSS is still anti-commercially exploitive.
> It would have more of an impact if a
> spokesman from a local Software House
> were to speak up on this Software Patents issue,
> and how it will affect his business:
> - how much higher the entry barrier will be raised,
> - the threat of legal lawsuits with every new feature included,
> - the time spent on researching prior patents,
> - the cost of registering patents,
> - the price of cross-licensing,
> and saying that copyright is good enough already.
Good one here. I don't intend to come; it won't be much for me to add. I
gave my remarks to the officials of MIPC / PHIM.
The one coming up on 19 is more of a political meeting; hopefully not a
Be prepared to refute the ridiculous argument it helps the local
inventor to get-rich-quick. I gave you the link for the filing / grants,
and this speaks louder than words.
The intention is the opposite: The more patents you dish out to MNCs,
the more you stifle the local inventor.
> With that, MDC can take note, and see that only
> large multinationals are only go gain from
> the enactment of software patent laws.
Let's be serious, the MSC has by now the 'failure'-status as far as
local contributions are concerned. The last straw is to bring in MNCs
and make it a 'corridor' of enterprises for regional trading and
subsidiaries. Sure: *now* the MNCs are highly interested to get a hold
of the market and kick out local competitors and 'pirates'.
But not - IMHO - because the MNCs are evil, simply because it *is*
difficult to sell fridges to eskimos or conquer a saturated market.
They look, like anyone else, for maximal ROI.
Any FOSS is less of the latter, and so - quite understandably - they
rather have the thumbscrews in place.
To unsubscribe: send mail to email@example.com
with "unsubscribe ossig" in the body of the message